We Are Available Virtually And Offering Online Consultations During This Time. Call Us For More Information.
Call Us Today
DUI Problems
Call Vince at
(949) 635-4392

DUI in California Safety and Construction Zones: Why the Stakes Are Higher

By Vincent John Tucci | Managing Partner & DUI Defense AttorneyGetting stopped for DUI in a California construction or maintenance zone can feel devastating. Orange cones, flashing lights, and active workers transform a routine stop into a high-stakes legal event. Under Vehicle Code §42009, fines double and potential jail time increases to protect roadside workers. At Braden & Tucci, we help clients understand these enhanced penalties—and how to fight them effectively.

What Makes Construction-Zone DUIs Different?

California treats DUIs near active work zones as aggravated offenses. When workers are present, courts impose double fines and enhanced penalties to deter dangerous behavior around crews exposed to freeway traffic.

Typical base DUI fines begin at $390 but exceed $780 under §42009—before court fees and assessments. These enhancements emphasize safety but also complicate sentencing and license reinstatement.

Enhanced Liability When Injury or Death Occurs

If a DUI crash in a construction zone injures a worker, prosecutors may file felony charges under VC §23153, punishable by up to four years in prison. Fatalities can result in gross-vehicular manslaughter or second-degree murder charges. According to SafeTREC (2024), one-third of California roadway deaths still involve impaired driving.

Our firm’s trial experience in serious-injury DUI defense helps clients navigate these life-altering accusations and present mitigating evidence early.

Risks of Impaired Driving in Highway Work Areas

Freeway work zones involve shifting lanes, cones, and reduced shoulders—conditions that make impaired driving especially perilous. With more than 30 percent of traffic deaths tied to alcohol, enforcement in these areas is strict and sentencing harsh.

Effective Defenses to Zone-Enhanced DUIs

  • Worker Presence Challenge: The enhancement applies only if workers were actually on site.
  • Signage or Notice Issues: Missing or obscured “Work Zone” signs weaken prosecution claims.
  • Testing and Procedure Errors: Breath or blood test irregularities can invalidate BAC evidence.
  • Probable-Cause Disputes: Unlawful stops or detentions may lead to suppression of evidence.

Our attorneys—certified in field-sobriety testing—leverage these defenses to reduce or dismiss enhanced charges whenever possible.

Prevention and Public Awareness

Understanding VC §42009 can prevent tragedy. Plan ahead with designated drivers or rideshares near active work areas. For those already cited, early legal intervention dramatically improves outcomes.

Case Example: Construction-Zone DUI Conviction

In a widely reported Sacramento case, a driver who entered a closed freeway section while impaired struck a worker and received a felony conviction with prison time (CBS Sacramento, 2012). It illustrates both the seriousness of the law and the importance of immediate, qualified defense.

Frequently Asked Questions

What if no workers were present?

The enhancement under VC §42009 applies only when workers are on site. An attorney can challenge this element and seek standard DUI penalties instead.

Are fines always doubled?

Yes, when the zone meets statutory conditions—but negotiated reductions are often possible with early representation.

How does injury change my case?

Any worker injury elevates charges to felony DUI with possible prison time; immediate legal counsel is critical.

Can signage errors affect my defense?

Absolutely. Missing or unclear signage may void the enhancement, reducing exposure to standard penalties.

What should I do first?

Call a qualified DUI defense lawyer as soon as possible to preserve evidence and request DMV and court hearings on time.

The Bottom Line

A DUI in a safety or construction zone carries steep, doubled penalties—but defenses exist. With experienced representation from Braden & Tucci, you can protect your license, freedom, and reputation.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance on your case, consult a licensed California attorney.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Testimonials Image Icon

Hi Vince,

I just wanted to take a minute to thank you again for the great job you did keeping Rick out of prison. You are awesome!!! I’ll be sending the rest of your fee ASAP. Thanks again :-}

L.T., San Bernardino, California

Hi Vince,

I just found out that I have gotten my medical license back without any restrictions or probation!!!!! I cannot express how thankful I am that you went the extra mile to help me when I know that you did not have to. You are an amazing lawyer, but more than that you are a great person. Really I am forever greateful.

P.S, Los Angeles County, California

*This case was a first offense DUI with a .19 blood alcohol level that I got reduced to a dry reckless and won the DMV hearing. I also assisted the client with the medical board of California and the Attorney General’s office……Vincent John Tucci, President of the CA DUI Lawyer’s Association

Hey Vincent,

Just wanted to thank you in writing for your flawless work in court today for my DUI case. I’ve heard it before but today I got to witness first hand that district attorneys and prosecutors don’t necessarily care about the truth or sometimes even evidence. What they care about the most is winning, regardless of the evidence or shady testimony of their key witnesses. I can honestly say that if I did not have you as my attorney and advocate, the prosecutor would have minced me up and grounded me to little bits of pieces. Your knowledge of the law and to effectively use that knowledge for the benefit of your client is in my opinion an art form and you have mastered it. I’m so happy that I trusted my instincts to retain your services. You did not let me down.

Thanks again Vincent!
Best regards,

Peter A.